> -----Original Message----- > From: Joerg Wunsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 2:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Eric Weddington > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] License for .dox files > > As Eric Weddington wrote: > > > I'm going through the .dox files in the doc/api directory. Why do > > these files have a 2-clause BSD license instead of the 3-clause > > license used for the source code? > > Good question, perhaps because Ted once created them that way? > > It shouldn't matter too much, as these files will never be linked into > customer's applications, but from a consistency point of view, it > doesn't make much sense either to have them under a different license > than the actual code.
Any objections, or problems in changing them to the 3-clause license, to be consistent? _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
