On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Dmitry K. <dm...@marine.febras.ru> wrote:
> > I against, to build full the avr-libc library for device, > > > this dramatically increase compile time > By how much? Seconds or days? If each devices is in its own header file, then could precompiled headers be used? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Precompiled-Headers.html I looked at doing this last week actually to speed up 20081205. The problem I ran into was getting the headers compiled due to the circular nature of the includes, and lack of defined CPU type define. I didn't spend any more time on it but I'm sure those problems are solvable. -- http://www.wearablesmartsensors.com/ http://www.softwaresafety.net/ http://www.designer-iii.com/ http://www.unusualresearch.com/ _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
