> -----Original Message----- > From: > avr-libc-dev-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongnu.org > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongnu. > org] On Behalf Of Bob Paddock > Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 4:50 AM > To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide. > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Dmitry K. > <dm...@marine.febras.ru> wrote: > > > > I against, to build full the avr-libc library for device, > > > > this dramatically increase compile time > > > > By how much? Seconds or days? > > If each devices is in its own header file, then could > precompiled headers be > used? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Precompiled-Headers.html > > I looked at doing this last week actually to speed up 20081205. > > The problem I ran into was getting the headers compiled due > to the circular > nature > of the includes, and lack of defined CPU type define. I > didn't spend any > more time on it > but I'm sure those problems are solvable.
IIRC, precompiled headers were mainly designed for large C++ headers that also had code in them. I highly doubt that precompiled headers would be useful for an AVR application. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
