> -----Original Message----- > From: > [email protected] > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongnu. > org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 6:55 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition > > I'm looking at the two USB definition that are missing iousbxx2.h and > iousbxx6_7.h to add pin definition by hand. I'm stuck with the > following dilemma: > > In data sheet for AT90USB646 as well as the one for AT90USB82, Clock > pin for the SPI module is name in the pin description section as SCLK > where as in the rest of the datasheet(specially in the SPI section) it > is refered as SCK. All other devices that I know of use SCK for SPI > clock. > > It is not much of a problem for AT90USB646, but AT90USB82 also > implement a PS/2 module, witch in his turn define a pin as SCK. > > So datasheets are not consistent on SCK Vs SCLK for SPI clock. > > If it were only of me I would rename SPI clock pin to SCK for both and > rename SCK to SCLK for PS/2 module in AT90USB82 case. But I'm not the > one writing the datasheet. Although they do have job openings in Ulm > and Heilbronn, but my German skill are only at B1 level :( >
Keep it consistent and do SCK across all devices. Send an email to atmel about their datasheet inconsistencies. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
