> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> [email protected] 
> [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.
> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:23 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition
> 
> While I'm at it, should I remove all the
> #define SIG_xxxxxxx _VECTOR(y)
> since they are deprecated?

Please, no, do not remove SIG_* definitions.



> Ron: Consider it done. Since I don't need it for my project, I won't
> update in there, but when I'll commit to avr-libc tree it will be
> included. If you do need it, fell free to ask, I'll make a zip file
> and send you all the patched headers.
> 
> Sample:
> 
> /* External Interrupt Request 5 */
> #define INT5_num                     6
> #define INT5_vect                     _VECTOR(6)
> #define SIG_INTERRUPT5                 _VECTOR(6)
> 
> Note that SIG_xxxx and yyyy_vect are not always aligned. yyyy_vect and
> yyyy_num however are always aligned.

I'd like to see a final patch before it is committed.


_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

Reply via email to