As Ruddick Lawrence wrote: > I think LibAVR might be too confusing.
I agree, though I also see Eric's point: assuming it will really become an object library, a link specification like -lavr looks good. But then, just because the object library is named libavr.a, nobody says this must exactly match the project name. ;-) (I really wonder what the "possible virus" might have been. :) -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
