On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:45:47 -0700 Ruddick Lawrence <rudd...@stanford.edu> wrote:
> The confusion I was talking about with LibAVR was not with the existing > Procyon library, but with avr-libc. Of course that only becomes a problem if > they are indeed separate projects, which brings me to my second point... Want some crazy (but google-safe) names? yalfa (yet another library for avr) lidr, or avr-lidr (from library & drivers) bonbon (not really google-safe, but certainly good ;-) ) Count me into the "will contribute chaotically" group, unless you insist on the CVS stuff, which I am not willing to learn to use properly (I guess there might be more of us with this attitude). JW _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
