Weddington, Eric wrote:
-----Original Message----- From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Galen Seitz Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 6:41
PM Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
avr-libc 1.6.8 [was: duplicating avr-libc fromwinavr]
Only in avr-libc-WinAVR-20100110/doc/api: unjs.pl Only in
avr-libc-WinAVR-20100110/include/avr: iotn10.h Only in
avr-libc-WinAVR-20100110/include/avr: iotn4.h Only in
avr-libc-WinAVR-20100110/include/avr: iotn5.h Only in
avr-libc-WinAVR-20100110/include/avr: iotn9.h
Can you explain why these include files are not part of the
tarball? I guess the bootstrap process removes them, since they
are not present in an actual WinAVR-20100110 install, but I'd
like to understand why.
Those are header files for new devices. However, support for these
new devices has not been officially added yet to avr-libc. There
are many more changes that need to be made before avr-libc supports
those devices. Also support for these devices has not been added
yet to binutils or gcc. But they are currently in-process, so
expect to see these devices in the near future. The fact that they
are not in the tarball should not be a concern at this point.
Thanks for the response. I just found it odd that these files are
tagged with avr-libc-1_6_8-release and yet they don't appear in the
tarball.
--
Galen Seitz
gal...@seitzassoc.com
_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
