As Weddington, Eric wrote: > Sounds good. Although why not use 1.7.0? AFAIK, no one has ever done > a public release using HEAD as 1.7.0. As maintainers, we ultimately > decide what the release versions will be. I'm concerned that users > will ask us what happened to 1.7.0 if we jump to 1.7.1.
I wasn't so sure about the lack of public releases. I can see traces of having released once from the head when it was at 1.5, but it appears we really never spun off something from the 1.7 head. If we're really sure it never happened, 1.7.0 is fine with me. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
