Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> As Paulo Marques wrote:
>
>> One thing we could do for the programmers that want to use the "raw"
>> cli version and know what they are doing is to keep a "__cli" or
>> "__raw_cli" version (or some other name) that just emits a single
>> "cli" instruction.
>
> I guess it's simple enough then to just write
>
> asm volatile("cli");
The same argument would hold for "nop", no?
And the counter argument is probably the same: the C code looks better
without "asm volatile" in the middle ;)
Anyway, I don't have strong feelings either way, so it's really your
call if it's worth it or not...
--
Paulo Marques
Software Development Department - Grupo PIE, S.A.
Phone: +351 252 290600, Fax: +351 252 290601
Web: www.grupopie.com
I have not yet begun to procrastinate
_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
