As Weddington, Eric wrote: > It's pretty easy to click on "Reply All". It becomes a force of > habit after posting on multiple mailing lists over several projects.
MUAs that understand RFC 2369 mailing list headers are supposed to evaluate the "List-Post" address. My Mutt doesn't, but at least, I can configure list replies separately there. Tweaking the Reply-To header is in general a very bad idea: it imposes a *high* risk of personal (and really private) mails leaking to the list instead of being sent to the intended recipient. Been there, seen that (with the XFree86 mailing lists about a decade ago). Some of the mails that accidentally escaped to the list in that situation were really embarrasing... For MUAs that don't understand RFC 2369 headers and cannot be configured to reply to known mailing lists, a group reply is still the best compromise. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev