> I think it can be argued either wise - "round up" or "round down". Both have > trade-offs. When "round up" is used, the user might end up wondering why delay > is a little more than what he bargained for.
Round Up might take a cycle or two or more than was asked for, which I doubt would surprise anyone. Any amount less than what was asked for might be a big surprise when something goes terribly wrong because the delay was not long enough. Always go for the operation of "Least Surprise". _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev