> >> >> Yes, the problem is figuring out which turns out to be least surpring :( > >My vote is for round up too, and it is the standard for delay functions >everywhere. See for instance: > >http://linux.die.net/man/3/usleep > >and notice the "(at least)" in the description. >
This looks affirmative. Thanks Paulo! Regards Anitha _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
