On Sun 30 Oct 2011 11:24:37 NZDT +1300, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > The least you could expect them is to explicitly mention *which* > problems they have found, either (and preferrably) as references to > GCC bug reports, or at least, as detailed descriptions about the > problems someone encountered.
Yes that would be more professional... > Good idea as well. Johann did a lot of work on the AVR part of GCC > recently, and he also backported all of the more important bug fixes > to GCC 4.6.x. = Georg-Johann Lay? > But: use GCC 4.6.3 rather than 4.6.2, so you benefit from the C++ > progmem string bugfix. Well 4.6.2 was released 4 days ago. The progmem fix was checked in 3 months ago. What's the story? Where is 4.6.3? Is packaging up the current bleeding edge a good idea? Thanks, Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
