On 08/02/2012 20:17, Vidya Praveen wrote:
Hi

Things change in the compiler and there are often cases which are not
covered due to several reasons. it's not uncommon to see something that
works in a earlier version stops working later. It will be great if you
could reduce your test case and/or find out what is going wrong and post
this in avr-gcc-list.If you think the problem is specific to AVR
Toolchain, I recommend you to contact the Atmel support. Thanks


You are probably better off posting such information to the avr-gcc mailing list rather than Atmel support. I have nothing to complain about regarding Atmel's support team - I have certainly encountered far worse - but by posting to the avr-gcc mailing list you get the information directly to the people responsible for the avr port of gcc, and you also inform other avr-gcc users.

mvh.,

David


Regards
Vidya Praveen



On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Daved <dehav...@verizon.net
<mailto:dehav...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    Thanks for the responses guys. It's not always clear where to post
    problems with this stuff.

    I have since done a general web search for the problem and did find
    a code correction for w5100.h. I was about to try it when my Arduino
    ATmega328P chip went bad and I am now waiting for another one in the
    mail. It's still puzzling why an earlier complier version works
    while a newer one does not.

    Anyway, I have already spent way too much time tracking this down so
    other than testing the code correction when I get a new chip, I am
    going to let it rest

    Dave

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joerg Wunsch"
    <j...@uriah.heep.sax.de <mailto:j...@uriah.heep.sax.de>>
    To: "David Brown" <da...@westcontrol.com <mailto:da...@westcontrol.com>>
    Cc: "David DeHaven" <dehav...@verizon.net
    <mailto:dehav...@verizon.net>>; <avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
    <mailto:avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org>>
    Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 5:46 AM
    Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #35467] Not sure this the right
    plce to submit this but...



        As David Brown wrote:

            For future reference, remember that when you make a bug
            report, the
            "summary" is critical - it lets people see at a glance what
            the problem
            is, it is used for searching for similar problems, and is
            used in
            reports of outstanding issues.


        Thanks for the reminder, I changed the subject in the bug
        tracker even
        though it's closed, for the benefit of those who are searching
        old bug
        reports.
        --
        cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

        http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
        Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



    _________________________________________________
    AVR-libc-dev mailing list
    AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org <mailto:AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org>
    https://lists.nongnu.org/__mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
    <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev>




_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

Reply via email to