As Uwe Bonnes wrote: > Is this intentional?
Yes, it is. > Or would a patch defining all those SIG_XXXY be > accepted? By no means. ;-) The old term "signal" and the respective interrupt vector naming has been deprecated 7 years ago. The old SIG_* vector names are only kept for compatibility reasons in those header files where they did already exist by that time. All newer header files only get *_vect style names. Ethernut should finally catch up. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
