As Uwe Bonnes wrote: > Should I provide a patch against avr-libc-1.8.0 or are the name differences > SIG_SPM_READY vs SPM_READY_vect and ANA_COMP_vect vs ANALOG_COMP_vect > intentional.
Yes, they are (unfortunately) intentional: the policy is to match the datasheet, rather than inventing our own names (as we previously did with the SIG_* names). Thus, if the ATmega16 datasheet names that vector "SPM_RDY" (and, by policy, the ATmega16A datahseet did not change this), but the AT90CAN128 datasheet names it "SPM_READY", we follow that (by simply appending "_vect"). -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
