On 22:21:37 28/08/2005 Brian Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I tested V2 with an AVRISP, I noticed the speed is much slower > than V1. Does anyone know if this is something that we are doing to > cause this, or if the V2 protocol is not lending itself to fast > programming? I.e., are we implementing V2 in a way that pessimizes > throughput, perhaps as a carry-over to the way we were using V1? Or > is the slowness inherent in the AVRISP device or the V2 protocol > implementation on the target device itself?
I have the opposite point of view: I find v2 quicker. However the initial v2 page write function was also writing pages full of 0xFF, and v1 was already optimized to skip such pages. The submited patch also correct that for v2. Bernard _______________________________________________ avrdude-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev
