Thanks, that is what I thought. Still not sure if I can get away with the Lite version. Is there a feature comparison of the two somewhere. Google searches did not turn up anything (except this thread, funny enough). Or should I just continue comparing the docs for each?
On May 4, 10:31 pm, Michael Iv <[email protected]> wrote: > Also Lite can deal with much more geometry without noticeable performance > drop . BUT from the other side lite has very few features in comparison to > Away3D full version . > So if you really need it for complex development use Away3D , otherwise go > for Lite > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Shawn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > I am brand new to Away3d and this group, so hopefully this is not a > > dumb question. I cannot find info about whether Away3D 3.5.0 > > incorporates all of the Flash Player 10 native 3d stuff that Away3D > > Lite does. > > > Is Lite still faster and able to handle more polys, or does 3.5.0 now > > use all of the same native Flash 3d stuff that Lite does? > > > Thanks, > > Shawn > > -- > Michael Ivanov ,Programmer > Neurotech Solutions Ltd. > Flex|Air |3D|Unity|www.neurotechresearch.com > Tel:054-4962254 > [email protected] > [email protected]
