I don't think there is , but you can just open the docs of the both and go through packages . There you will be able clearly see the difference !
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Shawn <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, that is what I thought. Still not sure if I can get away with > the Lite version. Is there a feature comparison of the two somewhere. > Google searches did not turn up anything (except this thread, funny > enough). Or should I just continue comparing the docs for each? > > > On May 4, 10:31 pm, Michael Iv <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also Lite can deal with much more geometry without noticeable performance > > drop . BUT from the other side lite has very few features in comparison > to > > Away3D full version . > > So if you really need it for complex development use Away3D , otherwise > go > > for Lite > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Shawn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > I am brand new to Away3d and this group, so hopefully this is not a > > > dumb question. I cannot find info about whether Away3D 3.5.0 > > > incorporates all of the Flash Player 10 native 3d stuff that Away3D > > > Lite does. > > > > > Is Lite still faster and able to handle more polys, or does 3.5.0 now > > > use all of the same native Flash 3d stuff that Lite does? > > > > > Thanks, > > > Shawn > > > > -- > > Michael Ivanov ,Programmer > > Neurotech Solutions Ltd. > > Flex|Air |3D|Unity|www.neurotechresearch.com > > Tel:054-4962254 > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > -- Michael Ivanov ,Programmer Neurotech Solutions Ltd. Flex|Air |3D|Unity| www.neurotechresearch.com Tel:054-4962254 [email protected] [email protected]
