Fabrice, here is the Google Analytics dump: 1. 10.1 r85 29,712 46.53% 2. 10.1 r82 8,728 13.67% 3. 10.0 r45 6,026 9.44% 4. 10.1 r53 5,026 7.87% 5. 10.0 r32 3,753 5.88% 6. (not set) 3,188 4.99% 7. 10.0 r22 2,361 3.70% 8. 10.0 r42 2,219 3.47% 9. 10.0 r12 894 1.40% 10. 9.0 r124 461 0.72%
That's for the last 30 days. Cheers, BW On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Fabrice3D <[email protected]> wrote: > do you have details on f10 variations? or at least 10.1? > > *ps: I don' think FP9 needs to be maintained going forward.* > *We have already announced with the release of 3.5 that dev on f9 would be > discontinued,* > *Same rule for maintenance. Except of course if something was terribly > wrong.* > * > * > *Last F9 is 2.52 > * > > Fabrice > > On Oct 30, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Bob Warfield wrote: > > Hey and thanks for all the fish(code) so far. >> Vic >> ps: I don' think FP9 needs to be maintained going forward. >> >> >> > > My Flash AIR / Away3D products cater to a pretty diverse nontechnical crowd > (manufacturing people). On the question of FP9, on my 42K uniques/month, > the breakdown is: > > - FP10: 94.29% > - No Flash installed: 4.99% > - FP9: 0.72% > > Cheers, > > BW > > >
