Hi John,

The website appears to be down at the moment (17:10 GMT), I will check again
later (tracert fails at as23352.xe-4-2-0-105-cr1-ams2.nl.nlayer.net).


I might have not got what you mean. But.....

The issue I have is, I must use Robotlegs or PureMVC, as they are industry
standard (most of my jobs ask for me to use them) even though most projects
in my oppinion don't merit or require these frameworks to be implemented at
all.

I would prefer a simple modular oop approach using (singletons, observer &
factory patterns) which is often faster, more productive and extensible
enough to meet the majority of projects requirements (keeping it simple).
But sadly I have to follow the masses and do what they say.


The idea to partially keep Away3D in the frameworks guidelines but break the
rules for a view not managing other views and haveing a single view to
manage rendering and cameras etc is the best way I can think of doing it.
Especially without breaking things down so much that I would end up having
multiple enter frame handlers running to manage rendering, camera and object
animation.

If I have to use Robotlegs and Away3D what would be your recommendation? Do
you have an example?

I will check your video out when the site comes back online, as always,
learning ;)

Thanks for you input.

D






On 23 March 2011 15:54, John Lindquist <[email protected]> wrote:

> Based on what you described, I would recommend extending the Away3D
> classes and injecting a traditional mediator before trying to force a
> larger framework solution into your project.
>
> Watch this if you need clarification on what I mean:
>
> http://johnlindquist.com/2010/10/13/patterncraft-mediator-pattern-vs-framework-mediators/
>
> Robotlegs, etc, solves a whole different set of problems than what
> you're talking about.
>
> On Mar 22, 10:55 pm, Darcey Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Can't find any contact details on his site...
> >
> > I guess no one has sussed the correct way to actually do this with that
> > robotic leg and all those other mvcs out there.
> >
> > Think I will stick to my way, it works, it's encapsulated, it's fast,
> just
> > it's not as the frameworks guidelines say it should be.
> >
> > D
> >
> > On 22 March 2011 18:41, John Brookes <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Try asking John for an example, mvc robotlegs etc
> > >http://johnlindquist.com/
>

Reply via email to