> But most notably, it has been very difficult > to find a reputable source online that has reviewed Awesome in any > way. Most press has been just blogs and nothing special. In fact, > Awesome has terribly marketing in general.
I've only just started using Awesome so my opinion won't carry much weight, but the most difficult thing I've found to deal with is the name. "Awesome" is so generic it's next to impossible to find anything specific through search engines, all the results get pushed out in favour of other unrelated things people find awesome. Thus the only source of information I'm aware of is the Awesome homepage. I've seen references to AwesomeWM, and indeed searching for this on Google brings a page of results entirely about Awesome. Perhaps if "Awesome" was only used as an abbreviation and the full name was written as "AwesomeWM" wherever possible, it might make it easier for people to find information about it? Certainly for me a full page of Google results makes me feel a lot more confident about the maturity of an application compared to no results at all! Cheers, Adam. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
