The name and website are exactly why I use awesome. It's OK to have a little swagger. Don't change it.
- Mike On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Julien Danjou <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrei Thorp <[email protected]> writes: > > > - With regards to this, it would be, again, if JD could give a bit > > of time to answer some questions (or someone else if JD is just too > > busy) > > I'm more than ok to answers questions by mail. > > > - Julien, a long while back, put out a call for an overhaul of the > > website. No one has stepped up. The website is... okay, but it doesn't > > do Awesome justice. It's not particularly interesting. It doesn't say, > > "this is the most cutting edge project ever". It could use a facelift. > > I'm very experienced with websites, but I'm an especially busy guy. If > > anyone else out there is a decent web developer and artist, we > > _really_ could use your help. > > I suck at website myself. I'd take anything better than the current one > and I would devote sometime to review and mentor anyone that would like > to do something better. > > > -- > Julien Danjou > // ᐰ <[email protected]> http://julien.danjou.info > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected]. >
