archlinux ftw! On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:00 PM, dante4d <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I investigated xephyr. Unfortunately, archlinux package doesn't compile for > me :(. I will put some effort into that. It might be good way to go but > still, my point was different - I think rc.lua approach is sometimes little > too difficult. > > Anyway, thanks for your opinion. > > Regards > David > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Damien Leone <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On 22 Jan - 14:15, dante4d wrote: >> > I wonder what you guys do when awesome changes it's rc.lua structure and >> your >> > rc.lua stops working. I always have to hand check and rewrite my rc.lua, >> > wasting about 30 minutes of time. Is that intended? >> >> If awesomerc.lua has changed a lot, I usually start by checking if my >> rc.lua would still work by running awesome in a nested X server (such >> as Xephyr), thus I won't crash my current session, then I would look >> at the X errors log file (~/.xsession-errors, or Xephyr's output) >> which will indicate me what lines of my config are not correct and >> then compare it with the provided rc.lua. >> >> This takes me about 5 min. >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Damien Leone >> > >
