On Jan 20, 2012 1:02 AM, "Julien Danjou" <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19 2012, Perry Hargrave wrote: > > > I think the license is different. > > But if they use awful for example, or maybe other parts, I'm not sure > the license can be different. This is why I'm asking. > > -- > Julien *Danjou*
Agreed. I get the impression that they made their own modules. If they used or patched any of the normal awesome distribution then they have to make it available. But if they made custom modules that only use awful they don't have to make that available, right? -- Perry
