Hello, Anurag Priyam <anurag08pri...@gmail.com> schrieb am Wed, 25. Jan 08:45: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Uli Schlachter <psyc...@znc.in> wrote: > > [Lot's of guesswork here] > > Indeed. > > > So anyone feels like asking gpl-violations.org for their input? > > > > IMHO this isn't a "big" violation. They are publishing everything, they just > > added their own copyright/license header where there previously wasn't one > > at > > all. Still, the default config should be covered by the GPL. > > Publishing code online hardly means anything. We need to be looking at > ways to get Amazon involved with our community. And by knowing if and > how Amazon violates GPL, we can _probably_ take step in that > direction. For example, if GPL requires them to submit modifications > (if any) back to the community we ask them to do so, and make sure > they feel welcomed (which Uli is pretty good at :)).
The GPL requires only to submit modifications to the customers of amazon as source code. This means, if a customer can access the config file on the kindle, it complys with the GPL. Regards, Heinrich
pgpa4fPcP8t1l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
