On 2013-04-26, Andre Klärner <[email protected]> wrote: > just a small question: if you don't want to use static rules, why don't you > "compile" the just before launching and feed them to awesome via > awesome-client? That way they don't exist in the config and you have only > to maintain within your launcher the ruleset how to match your starting > app.
Ah, that's an nice idea. Though I wonder what the rule should filter on; class and instance would be identical in different instances of the same program. WM_NAME is the filename of the document, which could be enough. But then those rules would be around indefinitely, and might be a nuisance later on, when programs may be restarted, tag set different, etc. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
