On May 24, 2012, at 7:49 PM, Scott Kovatch wrote:

> OpenJDK (IMO) shouldn't rely on an icon in a framework that could disappear 
> in the next year or two, so it should use its own icon. The AWT will need to 
> change for that to happen. If Apple would like to donate this icon I think it 
> would be great, and would solve that problem nicely. It's then up to Leonid 
> to decide how to best use it.

Just my 2ยข here:
* It is not accurate to imply that any Apple framework or resource therein is 
going to "go away in the next year or two".
* The Apple GenericApp.icns will be around as long as JavaRuntimeSupport and 
JavaNativeFoundation.
* The Apple GenericApp.icns will stay as is (it will not be up-res'd or 
improved).

The GA'd versions of 7u4 have effectively locked the filesystem location of 
this icon in stone for their supported lifetimes, in addition to all of Apple's 
Java SE 6 versions. I wouldn't suggest using the Apple icon if there is better 
or more accurate iconography available, but there is no risk in having a 
runtime dependency on it, as there is already today.

Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.

Reply via email to