The current fix isn't even "general" in this respect.
Unless there are some existing words somewhere, in
which case we would just have pointed JCK to those ..
On 3/15/17, 9:12 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
I guess that we cannot guarantee that some windows are visible and
other one are not.
We can say something general like in the current fix, or we can
provide an explanation of our internal implementation.
implNote isn't something JCK can (or should) use.
We can say something is not specified since it is platform dependent
and then they just know they can't test it .. although may not like it.
15 марта 2017 г., в 18:49, Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com
<mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com>> написал(а):
Good that got cleared up but since bar slight change in the wording
we are back to v0 of the webrev, then we are also back to v0 of my
comments. What are you going to say to JCK about what windows
they can expect to be visible ?
Can we say
- Frames are always visible
It is not necessary, if the frame has utility type.
So can we say this with that qualification ?
- Dialogs are always visible if they have no owner
This is implementation details on windows. I am not sure why it was
implemented this way, is it really intended behavior or not.
So we'd have to say its platform and implementation dependent
and add an implNote for audiences other than JCK.
- All other cases (eg Window) are platform dependent ?
Or can we say for the latter, other descendants of Window (including
Window itself) are never visible ?
What about the last point ?
-phil.
