Looks fine.
> 15 марта 2017 г., в 20:49, Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> написал(а):
>
> +1 from me.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 3/15/17, 10:47 AM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
>>
>> How about that version?
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~azvegint/jdk/9/8176528/04/
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eazvegint/jdk/9/8176528/04/>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexander.
>> On 15/03/2017 20:18, Philip Race wrote:
>>>
>>> Even if all we can add (to what is already proposed) is
>>> "whether an icon for a window is displayable in the task bar is
>>> dependent on all of window type, platform, and implementation"
>>> then I think that clearer than the current words which could be
>>> misinterpreted as meaning something like addressing that
>>> if you call hide() then of course it disappears ..
>>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>> On 3/15/17, 10:02 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is not necessary, if the frame has utility type.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So can we say this with that qualification ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is also implementation detail, that such windows are not visible in
>>>>>> taskbar. This is not specified anywhere and can be changed in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>> If this is consistent in our current implementation on all platforms then
>>>>> there is no problem making this part of the spec and changing the spec in
>>>>> the future if that changes.
>>>>
>>>> It was not implemented on systems other than windows, so if we change the
>>>> signature we will not be able implement/change this on linux/osx.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We have to say something. I can't agree the current words are enough.
>>>>
>>>> What is wrong in the current wording? If the element is not visible in
>>>> taskbar we cannot show something on top of it. We never specified when
>>>> something is visible/non-visible in taskbar.
>>>> We can update the words, but it will be good to use current methods
>>>> signatures.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -phil.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Dialogs are always visible if they have no owner
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is implementation details on windows. I am not sure why it was
>>>>>>>> implemented this way, is it really intended behavior or not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So we'd have to say its platform and implementation dependent
>>>>>>> and add an implNote for audiences other than JCK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure that we can describe all the cases when it works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To me the description like «Has no effect if this window is not visible
>>>>>> in the task area.» is enough because it also covered the case when the
>>>>>> window is invisible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - All other cases (eg Window) are platform dependent ?
>>>>>>>>> Or can we say for the latter, other descendants of Window (including
>>>>>>>>> Window itself) are never visible ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about the last point ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It depends from the implementation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
