Hi Sergey, Added the test case from the previous iteration of the fix. Please review the webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8136999/webrev.01/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8136999/webrev.01/>
Regards, Manajit > On 26-Jul-2017, at 10:32 PM, Sergey Bylokhov <sergey.bylok...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > Hi, Manajit. > Can you please add a test from the previous iteration of the fix: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8136999/webrev.00 > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8136999/webrev.00> > > ----- manajit.hal...@oracle.com <mailto:manajit.hal...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Kindly review the fix for JDK10. > > > > Bug: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8136999 > > <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8136999> > > > > Webrev: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8136999/webrev.00/ > > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8136999/webrev.00/> > > > > Fix: > > The flushEvent method is not required as mentioned in the previous review > > mail > > (http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-October/010201.html). > > <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-October/010201.html).> > > flushEvent related functionalities were modified while fixing issue > > JDK-8006634 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8006634> and hence > > deleted flushEvent method. > > > > Regards, > > Manajit
