Looks fine.
On 03.08.2017 6:27, Manajit Halder wrote:
Hi Sergey,
Added the test case from the previous iteration of the fix. Please
review the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8136999/webrev.01/
Regards,
Manajit
On 26-Jul-2017, at 10:32 PM, Sergey Bylokhov
<sergey.bylok...@oracle.com <mailto:sergey.bylok...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hi, Manajit.
Can you please add a test from the previous iteration of the fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8136999/webrev.00
-----manajit.hal...@oracle.com <mailto:manajit.hal...@oracle.com>wrote:
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>Kindly review the fix for JDK10.
>
>Bug:
>https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8136999
>
>Webrev:
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8136999/webrev.00/
>
>Fix:
>The flushEvent method is not required as mentioned in the previous
review mail
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-October/010201.html).
>flushEvent related functionalities were modified while fixing issue
JDK-8006634 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8006634>
and hence deleted flushEvent method.
>
>Regards,
>Manajit
--
Best regards, Sergey.
