I do not have physical access to mach5 linux system and I am not sure if
it allows remote access. Maybe Sergey can check what window manager
linux host is running.
Regards
Prasanta
On 06-Nov-19 9:18 PM, Dmitry Markov wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. If the issue always happens on the same
machine it makes sense to look into this host. May be some of its
settings are incorrect and it should be excluded from the list of hosts.
Thanks,
Dmitry
On 6 Nov 2019, at 15:38, Prasanta Sadhukhan
<prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com
<mailto:prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hi Dmitry.
My ubuntu18.04 is running on Gnome and I think mach5 linux is also
running same, I do not think mach5 linux system is running on Compiz
window manager, where the issue was seen earlier.
Regards
Prasanta
On 06-Nov-19 8:29 PM, Dmitry Markov wrote:
Hi Prasanta,
I do not see any problems in the test. Its current version looks
fine. The proposed modifications (in particular omitting sleep()
invocation) may disguise some real problems (see my previous email).
Yes, the original fix is still in place but I guess something must
have changed and the issue got visible again. According to
JDK-6895647 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6895647> the
original issue was only reproducible with specific window manager.
That may explain why it does not take place on your local system but
happens on some another.
Thanks,
Dmitry
On 6 Nov 2019, at 14:25, Prasanta Sadhukhan
<prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com
<mailto:prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com>> wrote:
On 06-Nov-19 7:50 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Why do you think the problem is not in the test? I guess this
exact issue of incorrect frame location is fixed by JDK-6895647
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6895647> in linux and
the fix still is there in XDecoratedPeer.java.
Also, the test pass always in local ubuntu18.04 system that I have.
it only fails on mach5 linux system (that too not every time) which
makes me think it's a test issue.
Regards
Prasanta
On 06-Nov-19 7:13 PM, Dmitry Markov wrote:
Hi Prasanta,
If I got it right, we might not have enough time to show frame on the screen
without sleep() invocation. As a result incorrect frame location will be
retrieved. So I think we should NOT get rid of sleep() call here.
Also it appears that the problem is not in the test at all.
Thanks,
Dmitry
On 6 Nov 2019, at 13:09, Prasanta Sadhukhan<prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com>
wrote:
Actually the failure is on linux. I have updated the JBS summary.
On 06-Nov-19 5:27 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
Please review a fix for an issue where it is seen the frame location is
sometimes wrong in mac on mach5 headful nightly run.
It seems to be a timing issue as it shows 10 frames by calling
frame.removeNotify(),frame.addNotify() repeatedly, which by the way are not
supposed to be called by programs directly.
Proposed fix is to make not to make thread sleep every time
removeNotify,addNotify is called so that there is no delay. I have ran mach5
job (in JBS) for 3 consecutive runs on all 3 platforms and they pass.
Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233703
webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8233703/webrev.0/
Regards
Prasanta
