On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:00:41 GMT, Artem Semenov
<github.com+36081106+savop...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.desktop/macosx/native/libawt_lwawt/awt/JavaComponentAccessibility.m
>> line 372:
>>
>>> 370: if ([javaRole isEqualToString:@"pagetablist"]) {
>>> 371: newChild = [TabGroupLegacyAccessibility alloc];
>>> 372: } else if ([javaRole isEqualToString:@"table"]) {
>>
>> Do we even need legacy peer implementation in the new classes?
>
> The new TabGroup is also named TabGroupAccessibility, so as not to get out of
> the naming, the old class is renamed for this, otherwise the building will
> fail.
But when are these Legacy classes used? The "pagetablist" and "table" roles are
being handled in commonComponentAccessibility and new implementation classes
will be used there. Why can't we just remove these legacy classes and any
references to them, instead of renaming them
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4412
