Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Yeah, most of those conditionals are what make the C code hard to port. > | > > | > no harder than the lisp non-portable sutff all over the place in the > | > Axiom source code. I don't think we have a perfect language match > | > here in terms of portability. I've coded for longtime in C and C++; I > | > don't think this particular is stuff is handled the proper way. > | I'm not going to start another pro-Lisp discussion. But I'd like to > | point out that Axiom's Lisp code is not representative of (modern) > | Lisp code. Furthermore the conditionals aren't organized very well and > | most of them are superfluos anyway, because they are for Lisps that > | are long dead and forgotten. > > Probably. > > > I followed this discussion > > http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2006/014309.html > > with some interest. Ok, I read the first dozen messages or so, but I'm not sure what you're aiming at (IEEE 754 or FFI?). Could you give me a hint?
Kai _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
