On March 20, 2007 12:23 PM Gaby wrote: > > Bill Page writes: > > [...] > > | I would like to proposed to Gaby and Waldek that we go ahead > | and establish wh-sandbox as the new trunk in svn at Sourceforge > | as soon as possible. When that is done, I think it would be > | appropriate to prepare up to date "Silver" binaries for as > | wide a range of hardware/operating systems as possible. I > | think that where it is possible, we should also include Aldor > | in these binaries. > > Instead of constantly changing branches for "new silver", I > would rather see a backport for specific changes from wh-sandbox > to build-improvements, and then when its status is clear to > what is still called "Silver". > > Waldek sent a list ago (I don't have that mail right now), we > should work out the details for backport. >
That would certainly be fine with me. The main reason that I currently favour wh-sandbox is that Waldek recently "backported" a selection of revisions from build-improvements to wh-sandbox. But I am not completely certain of the status of all potential revisions that we might want to include in a new "Silver". Of course I am especially concerned about the ability to build on Windows but I haven't tested this yet. >From my point of view, the creation of a new "Silver" trunk is a little overdue. Unfortunately only you and Waldek are really in a good position to do this. But with your direction I am certainly willing to help - especially in testing of the new release. Regards, Bill Page. _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
