Maybe it would be clearer to say "so they extend their tolerance" ?
Sorry for my poor English :-(
# [...] so they translate their tolerance to errors in experimental
# results toward tolerance to possible errors in commercial software
Ah, OK. You meant gratuitous interpretation, I suppose ? An
experimentalist has to be tolerant to errors because errors are
inherent to experiments. In particular, for him, a possible error in a
program is just one among _hundreds_ of other possible causes of
errors. For a mathematician, a possible error in a program used in an
article is one among _zero_ other possible errors (if his proof is
correct, of course, as also the proofs of theorems his article relies
on).
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
