Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit :
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Michel Lavaud wrote:

| | > | > # [...] so they translate their tolerance to errors in experimental
| > | > # results toward tolerance to possible errors in commercial software
| > | > | > | Ah, OK. You meant gratuitous interpretation, I suppose ? | > | > Do you have factual data? | > | > | Yes, cf the chapter on error bars, in any course of physics.

Please, don't pretend you don't understand my question and answer one
I'm not interested in.
You made a specific strong statement -- still quoted above.  Either,
it was a pure speculation from your part, or you have factual data to
back it up.  If the latter, please make them public -- in the interest
of rigor and openness as you promote.
I am very sorry but I don't understand at all what kind of "factual data" you want me to provide, if it's not estimates about software used, or causes of errors in experiments. I gave my interpretation about reactions I got from colleagues, in discussions that occurred along many years. If you don't agree with my interpretation, that's perfectly OK for me. Just next time, please try to explain more precisely what you mean, if you want precise answers. Your questions are too sketchy for me to understand.
 Otherwise, let's drop it
Yes, please.

Best wishes,
Michel



_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer

Reply via email to