"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ralf, | | On Tuesday, August 08, 2006 4:53 PM you wrote: | > Bill Page wrote: | > > I don't see any need to distinguish between c) and d). | > | > Well, if you are just a user of Axiom, you don't really need | > noweb. That was the distinction. | > | | Yes. So we may need to distinguish between two kind of Axiom | **developers** - Type 1: those who simply modify and create | new library code (Aldor or SPAD), Type 2: those who will actively | work with the underlying source code, including BOOT and lisp. | | Maybe we want to call developers of type 1 "advanced users"?
no, please! Let's keep it simple. We have Axciom developers, and axiom users. Axiom developers are those who work directly on Axiom's source files. Axiom users are those who install Axiom for their use. Axiom is complicated, rightly or wrongly perceived so. We don't want to give the impression not only Axiom developers are also complicated but Axiom users must be complicated too. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-mail mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-mail
