Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Let's keep it simple. We have Axciom developers, and axiom users. | > Axiom developers are those who work directly on Axiom's source files. | > Axiom users are those who install Axiom for their use. | | Hmm, for the moment, developers + users is OK for me. But as I said, a | user who writes a new library and extends Axiom need not have any | knowledge about how Axiom is build.
I agree wholeheartly. | However, in some sense you are | right, extension of the Axiom library makes him a 'developer', in | particular if he plans to give the sources to the Axiom | project. Otherwise we don't care anyway. Yes. Actually I'm arguing that an Axiom user who just launches axiom for calculator-type computations, or an Axiom user who develops a hyper-Groebner basis library for this purpose or colleagues are on the same footing from my perspective. However they become Axiom developer the day they starting modifying Axiom sources. | Maybe I just wanted to say: if someone wants to extend the Axiom | library there is no need to download all of the Axiom sources. A few | things would be enough. But I guess, it's too early to think about | that. You're probably right. I need to get this Autoconf stuff move on. Did you test build-improvements branch recently? -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-mail mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-mail
