Hi +1 for option 1 Reason It is very helpful to have all sources in samples even for a developer. For exmaple while developing, to immediately test the running status of the code I normally run the interoptest run script to get a basic understanding without heavy machinary of ant tests. On the otherhand imagine that when I take a fresh checkout the generation tool itself has a bug and not generating correctly!!. In this case if my main concern is not with fixing that bug , but if some otherthing I was working at the time then source in samples comes in handy even for temporarily.
The only drawback not keeping sources in samples is the delay we get while making a fresh checkout. This won't be a big thing for small samples. But if there are samples that contain lot of files we can opt not to pregenerate them damitha On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 17:06, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: Looks like we have two views: > 1. Keep generated code for some samples in CVS and remove the rest, > including all that of tests > 2. Remove all generated code for all samples and tests and put > generated code for samples only when packaging releases > > What are we going to do? > BTW, I prefere 2. > > Thanks, > Samisa... > -- Damitha Kumarage hSenid Software International (PVT) Ltd(Web: www.hsenid.com) [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lanka Software Foundation (http://www.opensource.lk)
