Hi Samisa, thanks for the response. What I was really wondering was more of wsdl support. If the tool was copied from the axis java and then modified to generate C++, then the engine of the tool the same (except for the output language of course). However, I'm more interested to know if there has been more fixes and changes, in terms of wsdl support (the engine of the tool), that is more upto date in one than the other.
Thanks, --- Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WSDL2Wsis based on Axis Java's WSDL tools. > While Axis Java tools generate Java code, WSDL2Ws > tools generate C++ code. > Hence I do not think they are comparable - they > serve different requirements. > > Thanks, > Samisa... > > On 4/23/05, Ahab Abouzour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Just wondering which WSDL2ws tool is more updated > to > > the wsdl spec and in better shape, is it the > WSDL2ws > > that ships with Axis-java or the one that ships > with > > Axis-C? > > > > Thanks, > > > > P.S. as I recall (and I'm not sure if I'm correct) > > that I read somewhere in this forum, couple of > times > > actually, that the java tool is more upto date and > in > > more active state!! > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
