Actually "Guththila" has namespace support and encoding support. Since we aimed for soap messages processing It can't work with DTD's and CDATA's. Therefore XML 1.0 complacency check won't work. That's good to have performance check against those parsers (xercesc/expat/) , In order to do a performance test I think we need to integrate "Guththila" with axis-c++. Any ideas??
After Implementing encoding support added some test cases. You can see current implementation at
http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/~premalwd/Projects/Guththila.html
Wiki page
--------------
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/tspp
thanks,
Dinesh
On 6/27/05, Lilantha Darshana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we have a successful impl. at hand we should move this in and replace
existing
and then we improve it.
I'm not sure there are many uses of either **/xml/tspp/ and **/xml/txpp/
for the
time being if I'm not mistaken?? Could any one let me know if we have
any release
level tests that uses **/xml/tspp/ and **/xml/txpp/?
Would it be possible to do some XML 1.0 compliancy & performance check
before we decide? If you would able to make it against xerces/sax/expat
and JSR 173 -
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr173/index.html
It would be great.
Where can we see the currently impl code?
Thanks
-Lilantha
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasarath Weeratunge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 12:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Moving Guththila to Axis C++ src tree
Hi,
How about moving Guththila code into the Axis C++ src tree?
Dinesh is trying to implement XMLParser interface in XMLParser.h for
Guththila. At the moment the code that we have in the src tree
**/xml/tspp/ and **/xml/txpp/ are both old versions of Guththila
written by Susantha, Damitha and my self.
Dinesh's code cannot be integrated with either one of these since its a
different fork of tspp altogether.
What I propose therefore is that we take off this code and substitute
Dinesh's code in their place. We can create a new subdirectory
`guththila'
at the same level as `xerces' and `expat' under **/xml/ and delete
old subdirectories `tspp' and `txpp'.
Dinesh's code builds on tspp code and implements a full StAX parser
with the exception of DTD's and a few other constructs rarely used in
Soap processing. It also supports character encoding schemes and comes
with a set of test cases. The encoding related code in the new code base
has
been completely rewritten unlike earlier (see **/xml/txpp/) where we
tried
to reuse code from expat. We also improved the tokenizing code and API
to be in
line with StAX.
IMHO cleaning up the src tree would make life easier for us who are
working on Guththila since then we can directly commit our code to the
CVS.
Regards,
--dasarath
_______________
Siebel
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CUSTOMER
Visit www.siebel.com
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains confidential and/or privileged information belonging to Siebel Systems, Inc. or its customers or partners. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all soft and hard copies of the message and any attachments. Thank you for your cooperation.
--
W.Dinesh Premalal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/~premalwd/
-----------------------------------------------------
$df -h /my/brain
