On 6/27/05, Lilantha Darshana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we have a successful impl. at hand we should move this in and replace > existing > and then we improve it.
my point exactly. > > I'm not sure there are many uses of either **/xml/tspp/ and **/xml/txpp/ > for the > time being if I'm not mistaken?? Could any one let me know if we have > any release > level tests that uses **/xml/tspp/ and **/xml/txpp/? to my understanding, even though both Susantha and Damitha started adding encoding support to the tspp code that I wrote, neither could complete it to the level of conducting tests. Further I went on to work independly of them and now the parser (the state machine) has been improved but that code has not been integrated with tspp/txpp... i.e. what u have in the src tree. Hence the src tree is now outdated. Dinesh started with my code and now he has added encoding support for that code. So this is the latest code that we have. > > Would it be possible to do some XML 1.0 compliancy & performance check > before we decide? If you would able to make it against xerces/sax/expat > and JSR 173 - > http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr173/index.html > It would be great. I'm not sure why this is necessary at this point since this is basically to get the src tree in sync with the latest code-- of course the more test we do the better it is but I'm not very keen on performance tests even before we get the parser going. The tests that we have prepared are to test the functionality and not intended to compare performance. Further though I have revised the basic state machine several times the encoding part is still very fresh and there is a lot that can be improved. I'm confident that given time Guththila pick up. --dasarath > > Where can we see the currently impl code? > > Thanks > -Lilantha > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dasarath Weeratunge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 12:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Moving Guththila to Axis C++ src tree > > Hi, > > How about moving Guththila code into the Axis C++ src tree? > > Dinesh is trying to implement XMLParser interface in XMLParser.h for > Guththila. At the moment the code that we have in the src tree > **/xml/tspp/ and **/xml/txpp/ are both old versions of Guththila > written by Susantha, Damitha and my self. > > Dinesh's code cannot be integrated with either one of these since its a > different fork of tspp altogether. > > What I propose therefore is that we take off this code and substitute > Dinesh's code in their place. We can create a new subdirectory > `guththila' > at the same level as `xerces' and `expat' under **/xml/ and delete > old subdirectories `tspp' and `txpp'. > > Dinesh's code builds on tspp code and implements a full StAX parser > with the exception of DTD's and a few other constructs rarely used in > Soap processing. It also supports character encoding schemes and comes > with a set of test cases. The encoding related code in the new code base > has > been completely rewritten unlike earlier (see **/xml/txpp/) where we > tried > to reuse code from expat. We also improved the tokenizing code and API > to be in > line with StAX. > > IMHO cleaning up the src tree would make life easier for us who are > working on Guththila since then we can directly commit our code to the > CVS. > > Regards, > --dasarath > > > > > _______________ > Siebel > IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CUSTOMER > Visit www.siebel.com > > This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and > contains confidential and/or privileged information belonging to Siebel > Systems, Inc. or its customers or partners. Any unauthorized review, use, > copying, disclosure or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. > If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please contact the > sender by reply e-mail and destroy all soft and hard copies of the message > and any attachments. Thank you for your cooperation. > >
