SOAP::Axis has been assigned within Perl CPAN for this product. Avoided Apache:: in namespace only because in perl, Apache namespace typically denotes a mod_perl specific product. I can request a change if there is sentiment that an Apache moniker should be publicly noted in the module naming.
Two other questions: 1) Should this discussion move exclusively to the axis-c-dev mailing list? 2) Licensing - The appropriate license should be Apache License 2.0, correct? On 7/27/05, Brendan W. McAdams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a fit of insanity, I've decided to do this, finally. > > I applied for appropriate namespace in CPAN, to at least get the ball > rolling on that court. > > I'm going to start going over code and starting to build a framework, > possibly based on dims' previously posted Python bindings, this > weekend. > > Not sure yet which is best - SWIG (more compatible with multiple > languages) or XS (Which I know much better than SWIG). > > Any suggestions? > > ------------------------------------------- > Re, Davanum's email from 2004-02-04.... > > Folks, > > Had a chat with Brendan McAdams (working on Geronimo/OpenEJB) who > suggested that we could VERY > easily wrap Apache C++ with SWIG (http://www.swig.org/) exactly like Xerces-P > (http://xml.apache.org/xerces-p/). This will be a good thing since the > ONLY option right now for > SOAP from Perl is SOAP:Lite. > > Anyone interested? > > Thanks, > dims > > ===== > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ >
