Hi all, If I get it correctly, according to the new structure, we won't have the "modules" directory any more. I personally don't like the idea of not having the "modules" directory. Also where is the "addressing" module ? Also I don't understand the reason for the wsdl module brought to top level ? Is wsdl module going to be a separate project ? I thought it is a part of axis2 core. I would rather go for something like this.
c/ |- modules/ | |- core/ | | |- wsdl/ (if I am not mistaken) | | |- other core modules | |- addressing/ | |- security/ (or rampart) - in the future |- util/ |- axiom/ |- xml-schema/ |- woden/ |- guththila/ - Sahan Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > nandika jayawardana wrote: > >> Hi, >> In addition to the above folder structure we will have to move out >> guththila as a seperate project ( at the moment guththila is also in >> xml folder). > > > + 1. > > Samisa... > >> >> >> >> thanks >> nandika >> >> >> On 5/17/06, *Damitha Kumarage* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: >> >> > Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: >> > >> >> Correct prefix... >> >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> >> Subject: Modified Axis2C folder structure >> >> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:40:27 +0600 >> >> From: Damitha Kumarage <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> >> Reply-To: Apache AXIS C Developers List >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> To: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Since we are going to separate Axis2 C sub/dependant projects >> into >> >> separate projects >> >> and at the same time keep them under Axis2 C folder struture >> for some >> >> time, I would like to propose the >> >> following folder structure. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> C >> >> | >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> | | | >> >> | | | >> >> util axiom xml-schema woden >> wsdl >> >> core >> >> >> >> Note that axiom contains all parser, soa and om related stuff. >> util >> >> contain all >> >> platform stuff as well. >> > >> > >> > +1. >> > >> >> >> >> In make install the sub/dependant project includes go into into >> >> c/inclue as following >> >> >> >> C >> >> | >> >> include >> >> | >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> >> | | >> >> | | >> >> util om >> >> woden xml_schema >> >> >> >> Other headers all go into c/include as before >> > >> > >> > Please rename om to axiom >> > Also does this mean that we have to prefix the header inclusion >> with >> > folder name? If yes then that is lots of trouble. >> >> OK, Then for the time being I'll have axiom and util headers >> installed >> into c/include. Other wise we will have to >> change all header files to include prefixed with project name >> >> > Also, I propose to keep the same prefix even if we now have >> different >> > folder names. e.g. even tough om and soap headers are in axiom >> folder, >> > the prefix would remain as axis2_om and axis2_soap. >> > >> > P.S. is there anyway we can shorten xml_schema? >> >> I prefer to keep it xml_schema because this going to be a C >> version of >> Xml Schema project. We did no architecture >> changes to Xml Schema so keeping the name as it is a good thing >> >> Thanks >> Damitha >> >> > >> > Thanka, >> > Samisa... >> > >> >> >> >> All libs goes into c/lib. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Damitha >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >
