Wouldn't it be better to follow the WSDL 2.0 property names so that
you have a one to one mapping between property names in the
services.xml. WSDL 2.0 property names are whttp:httploaction and
whttp:httpmethod where whttp is the namespace of the httpBinding.
Thanks,
Keith.
On Jan 25, 2008 4:21 PM, Dumindu Pallewela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 2:26 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > >
> > > <operation name="foo">
> > > <parameter name="HTTPMethod" >PUT</parameter>
> > > <parameter name="HTTPLocation" >foo/bar/{x}/{y}</parameter>
> > > </operation>
> > >
> >
> > +1. With the change to the param name to reflect tat it is REST, e.g.
> > REST_HTTPMethod & REST_HTTPLocation
> [/snip]
>
> Won't *RESTMethod* and *RESTLocation* be better, as HTTP is assumed anyway?
>
> -Dumindu.
>
> --
> Dumindu Pallewela
> http://blog.dumindu.com
> GPG ID: 0x9E131672
>
> WSO2 | "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform" | http://wso2.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Keith Chapman
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc.
Oxygenating the Web Service Platform.
http://wso2.org/
blog: http://www.keith-chapman.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
