keith chapman wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to follow the WSDL 2.0 property names so that
you have a one to one mapping between property names in the
services.xml. WSDL 2.0 property names are whttp:httploaction and
whttp:httpmethod where whttp is the namespace of the httpBinding.
But that is less readable IMHO as far as the users are concerned -
someone looking at service XML would not be able to infer that this is a
REST property.
Samisa...
Thanks,
Keith.
On Jan 25, 2008 4:21 PM, Dumindu Pallewela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 2:26 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
<operation name="foo">
<parameter name="HTTPMethod" >PUT</parameter>
<parameter name="HTTPLocation" >foo/bar/{x}/{y}</parameter>
</operation>
+1. With the change to the param name to reflect tat it is REST, e.g.
REST_HTTPMethod & REST_HTTPLocation
[/snip]
Won't *RESTMethod* and *RESTLocation* be better, as HTTP is assumed anyway?
-Dumindu.
--
Dumindu Pallewela
http://blog.dumindu.com
GPG ID: 0x9E131672
WSO2 | "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform" | http://wso2.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
