Steve, As for me...I have been strictly working on spec related bugs/problems.
Thanks, dims --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Jordahl wrote: > > Yes, I know you are talking to me as I stuffed in an API I needed for some work I > > am doing and > I wanted it to be in 1.1. I know this is bad. I also know that this change will > not introduce > a regression, so I don't feel that bad about it. > > Your commit was just a symptom; the problem is that we havent released > yet & we are encountering new things to add to the source tree. > > > > I am trying to get Macromedia resources to run the JAX-RPC TCK, which if it passes > > with the > current 1.1 source will allow us to ship. At this point this is the only thing > holding up 1.1 > as far as I know. The ETA for this work starting is Wednesday, but this is > tentative as the > testing resource is tied up with a release. > > > > Basically, we are in a pickle because we can't/won't release unless we pass > > JAX-RPC, but we > have no one who can run the test suite and we were unable to get it automated around > the 1.0 > release. Sam says he is close, but needs help that no one currently active is able > to provide. > > > > FYI Russell Butek from IBM ran the tests for the 1.0 release. > > I could get access to the TCK suite if I had to, but not in the > immediate future. How much effort is it to install & run? I bet the hard > part is processing the results. > > If all the barrier is the test suite, then we should branch off in CVS, > so changes can go into the main tree that wont surface till version 1.2. > > -Steve > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com
